To tidy up some of the scattered orphans that I've sewn throughout the universe of blogs, I'm resettling some of the best of my pithy little missives right here. ((The ones that I thought stunk. . .. you'll have to search and destroy on yer own)))
As I read Gary Baumgarten’s blog about protecting offensive speech (((not to mention the nooumerous news stories))) I am struck as to the overwhelming narrative on the need to protect hateful, hurtful expression, and the paucity of thought on the fact that not ALL speech is protected.
It is absolutely correct to protect the dissenting and angry expression, yet that anger and that dissent has to be tested and based on that test society can better discern whether the expressed thought should be protected or whether it presents a “clear and present danger,” thus falls outside of legal protection.There are two areas of unprotected speech that I think might come into play here, one is obscene language, the other is “fighting words.”